United States of America v. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6178
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6191
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6366
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
versus
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-98-358-A)
Submitted: March 15, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders (1)
denying his motion for new trial filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33;
(2) denying his motion to dismiss the indictment under Fed. R.
Crim. P. 12(b)(2); (3) denying his motions to reconsider the denial
of his Rule 12(b)(2) and Rule 33 motions; and (4) denying his
emergency motion for grand jury documents and motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 14 &
entered Dec. 17, 2001; Jan. 4, 2002; Jan. 9, 2002; Jan. 17, 2002;
filed Feb. 7 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --