Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-2440•William Whittman v. State of Virginia
02-2440Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.03.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2440
WILLIAM WHITTMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT
COMMISSION; CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON,
VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees,
DAVID A. BELL,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1362-A)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Whittman, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Osborne Barnard, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Whittman appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Whittman v. Virginia, No. CA-02-1362-A (E.D.
Va. Nov. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.