Ephrain Reliford, Jr v. Aiken County Sheriff's Department

02-2346Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.02.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2346
EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AIKEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; CHARLES
TRUESDALE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CREDIT OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District
Judge. (CA-01-4075-1-17)
Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Devereaux
Schultz, MCKAY, MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ephrain Reliford, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) and state law. Reliford also appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Reliford v. Aiken County
Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-01-4075-1-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2002;
Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.