Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-2009•Kamau Kambon v. Saint Augustine’s College
02-2009Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.03.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2009
KAMAU KAMBON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SAINT AUGUSTINE’S COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DIANNE SUBER, Dr.; BEVERLY DOWNING, Dr.;
MAURICE TAYLOR, Dr.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-884-5-BR)
Submitted: February 24, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Alan McSurely, Ashley Osment, MCSURELY & OSMENT, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Charles T. Francis, FRANCIS & AUSTIN,
P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; Randall M. Roden, THARRINGTON
SMITH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kamau Kambon appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Saint Augustine’s
College, on his age discrimination claim. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Kambon v. Saint Augustine’s
College, No. CA-00-884-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 30, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.