Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1953•Venna L. Spencer v. Morningside Police Department
02-1953Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.11.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1953
VENNA L. SPENCER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; TOWN OF
MORNINGSIDE, MD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
01-3746-PJM)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Venna L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, ALLEN, KARPINSKI,
BRYANT & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Venna Spencer appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Spencer v. Morningside Police Dep’t, No. CA-
01-3746-PJM (D. Md. July 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.