Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1705•Adeline Uwazih v. Jeffrey Schierwagen
02-1705Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.01.2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1705
ADELINE UWAZIH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JEFFREY SCHIERWAGEN; HILDA M. BARG; CARL M.
BARG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-01-1369-A)
Submitted: December 17, 2002 Decided: January 15, 2003
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John O. Iweanoge, Rosslyn, Virginia, for Appellant. Steven Mark
Levine, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adeline Uwazih appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her diversity-based personal injury suit for lack of jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Uwazih v. Schierwagen, No. CA-01-1369-A (E.D. Va. filed June 18,
2002; entered June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.