Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1686•Coburn T. Norfleet v. United States of America
02-1686Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.10.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1686
COBURN T. NORFLEET,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-57-BR)
Submitted: October 11, 2002 Decided: October 25, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Coburn T. Norfleet, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Dudeck, Jr., Jonathan
D. Carroll, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition to quash six administrative summonses
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609 (2000). Our review of the record and
the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Norfleet v. United States, No. CA-02-57-BR (E.D.N.C. May 22, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.