Walter Doe v. United States of America

02-1678Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.04.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

* Judge Luttig was originally assigned to the panel in this
case but did not hear oral argument. The decision is filed by a
quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1678
WALTER DOE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PAMELA ROE, in her
individual and official capacities; ROBERT
NOE, in his individual and official
capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-02-4)
Argued: April 1, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, * and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
ARGUED: Abram William VanderMeer, Jr., PENDER & COWARD, P.C.,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael Anson Rhine,
Assistant United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Paul J. McNulty,
United States Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
During oral arguments held on April 1, 2003, the parties
agreed that there was no longer any relief that could be had for
the plaintiff in this case. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed
as moot.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.