Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1604•Michael W. McRae v. State of Maryland
02-1604Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.10.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1604
MICHAEL W. MCRAE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF
PERSONNEL; MARYLAND CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE’S
ASSOCIATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
(CA-02-1648-S)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael W. McRae, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael W. McRae appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See McRae v. Maryland, No. CA-02-1648-S (D. Md. May 10,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.