Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1511•Timothy A. Pledger v. THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, A Virginia Municipal Corporation
02-1511Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1511
TIMOTHY A. PLEDGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, A Virginia
Municipal Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-00-598-2)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy A. Pledger, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Scott Boynton,
Kimberly Rouse Essendelft, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Virginia Beach,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy A. Pledger appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Pledger v. City of Virginia, No. CA-00-598-2
(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2002). We deny Pledger leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.