Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1484•Jerald Jay Zeger v. Board of Visitors, the Naval Academy
02-1484Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.12.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1484
JERALD JAY ZEGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOARD OF VISITORS, THE NAVAL ACADEMY; JOSEPH
SPINELLI; PETER FIRENZI; MICHAEL HOREAN; KERRY
TAYLOR; MONICA TOMASZEWSKI; LEAH SE LOS REYES;
LINDA-MD KIRILENKO; THE BOARD OF REGENTS,
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
652-MJG)
Submitted: November 18, 2002 Decided: December 18, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerald Jay Zeger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerald Jay Zeger appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil rights complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zeger v. Board
of Visitors, No. CA-02-652-MJG (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.