Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1468•Elliott Roy Brown v. CIRCUIT COURT of FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA
02-1468Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1468
ELLIOTT ROY BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CIRCUIT COURT of FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA;
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE; WILNET A. BROWN;
JACK B. STEVENS, Circuit Court Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-1484-A)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elliott Roy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, James
Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elliott Roy Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
his claims of declaratory relief, accounting, and restitution. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County,
No. CA-01-1484-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.