Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1321•In re: Thelma Mathis
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1321
In Re: THELMA MATHIS,
Debtor.
THELMA L. MATHIS,
Appellant,
versus
MID-STATE HOMES, INCORPORATED; JIM WALTER
HOMES, INC.,
Appellees,
and
ROBERT KANE, Trustee,
Party-in-interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-1791, BK-99-10158-SSM)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thelma L. Mathis, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Keith Gallagher,
LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Thelma L. Mathis appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying relief on her
claims and determining the amounts due under a secured deed of
trust on Mathis’ real property. Our review of the record and the
opinions below discloses no reversible error. As the district court
correctly noted, the bankruptcy court’s thorough opinions reflect
no error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Mathis v. Mid-State Homes,
Inc., Nos. CA-01-1791-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2002); BK-99-10158-SSM
(Bankr. E.D. Va. July 25, 2001 & Jan. 22, 2001). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.