Michael T. Masuoka v. G. W. Murphy Construction Company, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1189
MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INCORPORATED; 1-5 JOHN DOES, Entities; JANE
DOES, 1-5 Entities; DOES CORPORATION, 1-5
entities; DOES PARTNERSHIP, 1-5 Entities; JOHN
DOES, 1-5 Governmental Entities; JANE DOES, 1-
5 Governmental Entities,
Defendants - Appellees,
versus
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.; KENNETH T.
GOYA, Insurance Agent,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-829-AM)
Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: July 8, 2002
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se. Mark David Crawford,
FRIEDLANDER, MISLER, FRIEDLANDER, SLOAN & HERZ, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order denying
his “motion for independent action to vacate and set aside the
judgments filed on February 14th and 21st.” We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., No. CA-00-829-AM (E.D. Va.
Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --