Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1118•In re: Hague Convention
02-1118Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.06.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1118
JENNIFER STURM, In re: Hague Convention
Petition for Return of Child to Petitioner,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-00-353-1)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert N. Weckworth, Jr., Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Jennifer Sturm, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Harris appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), to reopen
a case in the district court due to fraud. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Sturm v. Harris, No. CA-00-
353-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.