Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1098•Earl S. Gordon v. Sheila Sheths, M.d
02-1098Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.05.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1098
EARL S. GORDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHEILA SHETHS, M.D.; RONALD PETERSON, CEO; THE
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01-
2878-MJG)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl S. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. M. Natalie McSherry, Catherine
Whitehurst Steiner, Tracy A. Cannon, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earl S. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gordon v.
Sheths, No. CA-01-2878-MJG (D. Md. filed Jan. 8, 2002 & entered
Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.