Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-1064•Zafar Khan v. Popeyes of Maryland, Incorporated
02-1064Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.05.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1064
ZAFAR KHAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
POPEYES OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-1478-H)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zafar Khan, Appellant Pro Se. Leonard Henry Pazulski, CHARLES E.
CHLAN & ASSOCIATES, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zafar Khan appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to the Appellee in his discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Khan v. Popeyes of Maryland, Inc., No. CA-01-1478-
H (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2002). We deny Khan’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.