Cathy B. Branch v. City of Richmond

02-1047Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.06.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1047
CATHY B. BRANCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF RICHMOND; CLAUDE G. COOPER; DYETT B.
ELLIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-01-366-3)
Submitted: May 23, 2002 Decided: June 17, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cathy B. Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly Agee Burton, Assistant
City Attorney, Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The magistrate judge had jurisdiction to enter a final order
pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2001).
2
PER CURIAM:
Cathy B. Branch appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Branch’s
employment discrimination action. * We have reviewed the record and
the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
Branch v. City of Richmond, No. CA-01-366-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 4,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.