Kathy I. Riley v. Beverage Air, a division of Specialty Equipment Manufacturing Company

02-1037Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.06.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1037
KATHY I. RILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BEVERAGE AIR, a division of Specialty
Equipment Manufacturing Company,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-2267-8-24)
Submitted: June 18, 2002 Decided: June 28, 2002
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Krause, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN M. KRAUSE, P.A., Anderson,
South Carolina; Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for
Appellant. S. Clay Keim, Jeffrey A. Lehrer, EDWARDS, BALLARD,
BISHOP, CLARK, STURM & KEIM, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kathy Riley appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment and dismissing her state privacy act and Family
and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claims. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654 (West
1999). We have reviewed the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Riley v. Beverage Air, No. CA-00-2267-8-24 (D.S.C.
Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.