Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-8008•United States of America v. Emmanuel Uzuegbunam
01-8008Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.03.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMANUEL UZUEGBUNAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-96-43)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: March 15, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Uzuegbunam, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Uzuegbunam appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny Uzuegbunam’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny
a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Uzuegbunam, No. CR-96-43 (E.D.
Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.