Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7977•Ronald B. Jackson v. BONNER, Housing Unit Manager
01-7977Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.08.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7977
RONALD B. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; GENE M. JOHNSON,
Deputy Director; DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief
Warden; K. V. BONNER, Housing Unit Manager; P.
HARRISON, Lieutenant; LAWRENCES, Inmate
Hearings Officer; J. JOHNSON, Sergeant; M. C.
MILLARD, Associate Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-00-421)
Submitted: June 26, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002
Before WILKINS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald B. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald B. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Angelone, No. CA-00-421
(E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.