Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7881•Ronald Richard Smith v. DAN L. DOVE, Warden of FCI Edgefield
01-7881Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.04.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7881
RONALD RICHARD SMITH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DAN L. DOVE, Warden of FCI Edgefield; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-2759)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Richard Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Richard Smith appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation denying his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Dove, No. CA-
01-2759 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.