Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7864•United States of America v. Woods, Nos. CR-98-1172
01-7864Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.04.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7864
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DERRICK WOODS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-98-1172, CA-01-745-7-20)
Submitted: March 12, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Woods seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Woods, Nos. CR-98-1172; CA-
01-745-7-20 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2001); see also Muth v. United States,
1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (declining to consider claim raised
for the first time on appeal). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.