Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, a/k/a Richard Edward Janey v. Maryland Division of Correction

01-7810Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.03.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7810
MALCOM MAXWELL RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Edward
Janey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; STUART O.
SIMMS, Secretary; MR. NINES, CMS II; S. A.
WILSON, CO II, Assistant Coordinator; L. K.
NATALE, CO II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-1759)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint because he failed to inform the court of his change
of address. Our review of the record and the district court’s
opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the district court’s reasoning. Ryidu-X v. Maryland Dep’t of
Correction, No. CA-01-1759 (D. Md. filed Sept. 24, 2001; entered
Sept. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.