Jeffrey D. Lancaster v. Jerry Monette

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7717
JEFFREY D. LANCASTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JERRY MONETTE; NANCY TOOTLE; FRANK HENDERSON;
JOHN POTTER; JOHN DOE; JAMES DOE; JIM DOE; BOB
DOE; ROBERT DOE; LARRY NORMAN; LINDA BLOUNT;
CRAVEN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; BONNIE DOE;
WILLEY DOE; GEORGE DOE; BOBBY DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-481-5-F)
Submitted: March 13, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey D. Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey D. Lancaster appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re-
versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Lancaster v. Monette, No. CA-99-481-5-F (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --