Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7548•United States of America v. Enrico Salazar Sanchez, a/k/a Juan Sanchez, a/k/a Carlos Pun
01-7548Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.01.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7548
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ENRICO SALAZAR SANCHEZ, a/k/a Juan Sanchez,
a/k/a Carlos Pun,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
00-36-DKC)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 9, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Enrico Salazar Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada,
Assistant United States Attorney, Gina Laurie Sims, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Enrico Salazar Sanchez appeals from the district court’s order
denying Sanchez’s “Motion to Withdraw Unauthorized Enhanced Sen-
tence.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sanchez, No. CR-
00-36-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.