Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7297•Lawrence E. Griffin v. MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden, District of Columbia Department of Corrections
01-7297Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.01.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7297
LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden, District of Columbia
Department of Corrections; EUGENE SMITH,
Agents in Active Concert; RUSSELL CANON,
Defense Counsel,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-1011-AM)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Griffin v. Elzie, No. CA-01-1011-AM (E.D.
Va. filed July 30, 2001; entered July 31, 2001). We grant Griffin’s
motion to supplement exhibits and deny the pending motions to add
a third party and for summary judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.