United States of America v. Roland Able Gomes

01-7239Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.12.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7239
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROLAND ABLE GOMES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-88-38, CA-01-61-5-01-V)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 6, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roland Able Gomes, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roland Able Gomes seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion construed as filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2001) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Gomes, Nos. CR-88-38; CA-01-61-5-01-V (W.D.N.C. May 31,
2001; filed July 5, 2001 & entered July 12, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.