Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7154•James Edward Brown v. D. L. HOBBS, Warden, Jesup FCI
01-7154Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.10.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7154
JAMES EDWARD BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. L. HOBBS, Warden, Jesup FCI,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-2173-7-13BG)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Brown appeals the district court order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record, the district court order and the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation and affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.