Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7072•United States of America v. Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr
01-7072Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.10.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7072
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-97-262, CA-01-2115-8-20)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. E. Jean Howard,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-01-2115-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2001;
filed June 14, 2001, entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.