Wayne P. Thomas v. JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7063
WAYNE P. THOMAS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-265-3)
Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 19, 2001
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne P. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne P. Thomas appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(1994) after construing it as a motion to vacate or set aside his
sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Thomas v. Brooks, No. CA-01-265-3 (E.D. Va. May
23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --