Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-7016•United States of America v. Robert S. Jackson-Bey, a/k/a Ali Jackson, a/k/a Ali Jameson
01-7016Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.10.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT S. JACKSON-BEY, a/k/a Ali Jackson,
a/k/a Ali Jameson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-92-75-A)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert S. Jackson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald J. Smagala, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert S. Jackson-Bey appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying his
motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Jackson-Bey, No. CA-92-75-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 25,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.