Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6872•Edward Lonnie McCarroll v. JIM HUNT, Governor
01-6872Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.07.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6872
EDWARD LONNIE MCCARROLL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIM HUNT, Governor; MIKE EASLEY, Attorney
General; THEOTIS BECK, Secretary of Correc-
tions; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons;
JAMES FRENCH, Superintendent; RAFAEL HALL,
Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-173-3-MU)
Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lonnie McCarroll appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint
under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See McCarroll v. Hunt, No. CA-01-173-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 17,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.