United States of America v. Rohan St. Joseph Keating

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6810
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-66, CA-00-857-2)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rohan St. Joseph Keating seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Keating,
Nos. CR-93-66; CA-00-857-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2001). In addition,
we note that Keating’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial
did not toll the statute of limitations. See United States v.
Prescott, 221 F.3d 686 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --