Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6742•John Livesay v. W. O. WARD, Medical Doctor
01-6742Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.07.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6742
JOHN LIVESAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. O. WARD, Medical Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL; DARNLEY HODGE,
Superintendent,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-98-1351-2)
Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
John Livesay, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Paul Falzone, John Kenneth
Byrum, Jr., Chandra Dore Lantz, HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, WEINBERG, COX
& ALLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John Livesay appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Livesay v. Ward, No. CA-98-1351-2 (E.D. Va. Mar.
28, 2001). We deny Livesay’s motion to appoint counsel and dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.