United States of America v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 2000 . 2 PER CURIAM: Devon Brooks seeks to appeal the…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6726
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DEVON BROOKS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
98-519-DKC, CA-00-430-DKC)
Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devon Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* We reject Brooks’ claim that his counsel provided ineffec-
tive assistance in regard to his appellate rights. See Roe v.
Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Devon Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal primarily on the reasoning of
the district court. * United States v. Brooks, No. CR-98-519-DKC;
CA-00-430-DKC (D. Md. filed Apr. 10, 2001; entered Apr. 11, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --