Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6653•Stephen E. McClelland v. SHERIFF’S DEPUTY, Deputy Barbershop
01-6653Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.08.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6653
STEPHEN E. MCCLELLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY, Deputy Barbershop; CORREC-
TIONAL OFFICER DUNN; JACK LEE, Correctional
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-00-807)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen E. McClelland, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen E. McClelland, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny McClelland’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. McClelland v. Sheriff’s Deputy,
No. CA-00-807 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.