Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6650•Onaje Kudura Seabrook v. LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Supervisor of Cypress Unit at Kershaw Correctional Institution
01-6650Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.09.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6650
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Supervisor of Cypress
Unit at Kershaw Correctional Institution;
DAVID A. KING, Officer at Kershaw Correctional
Institution; RICKIE HARRISON, Warden of
Kershaw Correctional Institution; DEBBIE WISE,
Grievance Coordinator at Kershaw Correctional
Institution; DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPART-
MENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-3133-2-13AJ)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Onaje Kudura Seabrook, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.
MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Onaje Kudura Seabrook appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Seabrook v. Robinson, No. CA-99-3133-2-13AJ (D.S.C.
Mar. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.