Lawrence E. Griffin v. MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden

01-6598Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.08.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6598
LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,
Movant - Appellant,
versus
MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-01-3-3)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion accepting the report and recommen-
dation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Griffin’s motion to amend his pleading and
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Griffin v.
Elzie, No. CA-01-3-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2001). We deny Griffin’s
motion for appointment of counsel and his motion captioned “Appel-
late Revised Petition Remanding Motion to Dismiss.” We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.