Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6575•United States of America v. Steven Desmond Peterson
01-6575Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.08.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6575
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STEVEN DESMOND PETERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CR-94-46-3-H)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 30, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Desmond Peterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Peterson appeals from the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion for production of transcripts at government expense.
Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. United States v. Peterson, No. CR-94-46-3-H
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.