Nelson Bradley v. Douglas Vargo

01-6489Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.06.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6489
NELSON BRADLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS VARGO; ALPHONSO HICKS; MARVIN LEE;
DAVID GARRAGHTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-99-1230-2)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 11, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nelson Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant At-
torney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nelson Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Bradley v. Vargo, No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D. Va.
Feb. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.