Edward Sutton, Jr v. JIMMY JONES, Director of Kershaw County Deten- tion Center

01-6351Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.06.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6351
EDWARD SUTTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIMMY JONES, Director of Kershaw County Deten-
tion Center; DOCTOR’S CARE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-289-6)
Submitted: May 22, 2001 Decided: June 7, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Sutton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina; James E. Parham, Jr., John Eric Fulda,
Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Sutton, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint and
denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magis-
trate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sutton v.
Jones, No. CA-00-289-6 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2001; amended judgment
filed Feb. 1, 2001; entered Feb. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.