Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6339•Joseph Stilwell v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CA-99-1094-AM
01-6339Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.06.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6339
JOSEPH STILWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CONCECO, Medical Contractor; DOCTOR WRAY;
DOCTOR STERN, a/k/a F. C. Sturmer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-1094-AM)
Submitted: May 8, 2001 Decided: June 5, 2001
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Stilwell, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Fletcher Rennie, IV,
COWAN & OWEN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Stilwell appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights
complaint alleging that the Appellees were deliberately indifferent
to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stilwell v.
Conceco, No. CA-99-1094-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.