Henry Lotson Spence, Sr v. Joseph M. Brooks

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6165
HENRY LOTSON SPENCE, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-00-446)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 26, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tara Louise Casey,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Spence v. Brooks, No. CA-00-446 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28,
2000). We deny Spence’s motion for appointment of counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --