United States of America v. Abu Ashonte Ali, a/k/a Marty Boldin, a/k/a Marty Boldwin

01-6122Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.04.2001

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6122
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ABU ASHONTE ALI, a/k/a Marty Boldin, a/k/a
Marty Boldwin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-95-31, CA-98-982-2)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abu Ashonte Ali, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Abu Ashonte Ali seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure seeking to vacate the order denying his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ali’s
motion was a second or successive § 2255 motion and he did not seek
authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244, 2255.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.