Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-6004•Curtis J. Bridges v. E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman, Virginia Pa- role Board
01-6004Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.03.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6004
CURTIS J. BRIDGES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman, Virginia Pa-
role Board; GENE M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director,
Division of Operations, VDOC; JACK LEE, War-
den, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; JOHN
R. ALDERMAN, Chairman of the Virginia Parole
Board; JAMES JENKINS, Chairman of the Virginia
Parole Board; RON ANGELONE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-00-771-7)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis J. Bridges, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis J. Bridges appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bridges v. Tucker, No. CA-00-771-7 (W.D.
Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.