In re: Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4835
In Re: RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-96-34)
No. 01-7779
RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR., a/k/a Steven Ray
Maupin,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-01-76-7)
Submitted: February 28, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
No. 01-4835 petition denied and No. 01-7779 affirmed by unpublished
per curiam opinion.
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In No. 01-4835, Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., has filed a motion
for a writ of prohibition and writ of mandamus seeking to have this
court direct the district court to terminate criminal proceedings
against him on double jeopardy grounds. Because Mettetal has now
been convicted and sentenced after a retrial, we dismiss the
petition as moot. We do, however, grant Mettetal leave to proceed
in forma pauperis.
In No. 01-7779, Mettetal appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Mettetal v. United States, No. CA-01-76-7 (W.D.
Va. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 01-4835 - PETITION DISMISSED
No. 01-7779 - AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --