Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2477•Darryl Allmond v. Royal Insurance Company of America
01-2477Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.03.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2477
DARRYL ALLMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; ANGELA
BARTLEY, Claim Representative; BENJAMIN J.
TRICHILLO; YOUNG J. YOU; ROGER GISOLFI;
MICHELE HEDIN; HOME PLACE; LYNN DONAHUE;
NICHOLAS PATRONAS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-01-1468)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lewis Rigsby, Charles F.
Midkiff, MIDKIFF, MUNCIE & ROSS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Ronald
Paul Herbert, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Cynthia Lee
Santoni, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, McLean, Virginia; William Boyle
Porter, Maura Jane Graham, BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, Fairfax, Virginia;
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Robert J. Lloyd, III, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia;
Stephen Lewis Altman, Marc Andrew Brown, MONTEDONICO, HAMILTON &
ALTMAN, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Allmond v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, No. CA-01-1468 (E.D. Va.
filed Dec. 7, 2001; entered Dec. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.