Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-2425•H&wfresh Seafoods, Incorporated v. Lewis Schulman
01-2425Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.02.2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2425
H&W FRESH SEAFOODS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEWIS SCHULMAN,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
SCOTT TAYLOR; HEWS SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-3851-CCB)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 22, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lewis Schulman, Appellant Pro Se. John Stephen Simms, GREBER &
SIMMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lewis Schulman appeals from the district court’s order de-
clining to reconsider the denial of Schulman’s motion to vacate the
default judgment entered against him. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. H&W
Fresh Seafoods, Inc. v. Schulman, No. CA-98-3851-CCB (D. Md. July
12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.