Wealegbay J.g. Tayn, Sr v. Walter Kidde

01-2421Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.02.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2421
WEALEGBAY J.G. TAYN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WALTER KIDDE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-00-749-1)
Submitted: February 6, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wealegbay J.G. Tayn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Matthew Keen,
Sheri Lea Roberson, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Wealegbay J.G. Tayn, Sr., appeals from the district court’s
judgment granting summary judgment to Walter Kidde and dismissing
his employment discrimination complaint. Tayn claims he was dis-
criminated against and faced a hostile work environment because of
his race, national origin, and age. He further claims his dis-
charge from employment was retaliatory. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Tayn v. Kidde, No. CA-00-749-1 (M.D.N.C.
Oct. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.